← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/535/2016disposed

Bhagwati Prasad v. The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Government Of Bihar, Patna And ORS.

2016-10-03The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.535 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Bhagwati Prasad Son of Late Shyam Sundar Prasad residet of VillageSareya, Police Station- Krishnagarh in the district of Bhojpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar Through The Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Inspector General of Police, Patna.

4. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Rohtas.

5. The Superintendent of Police, Bhojpur.

6. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ara Sadar, Bhojpur.

7. The SHO, Krishnagarh Police Station, in the district of Bhojpur. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. P.N. Sahi, AAG-6, Mr. Anant Prasad Singh, SC-15 Mr. Avinash Kumar, AC to SC-15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 03-10-2016 Heard Mr.

Sunil Kumar, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Mr. Pushkar Narain Sahi, learned Additional Advocate General No.6, appearing on behalf of the State-respondents.

In compliance with the order, dated 27.09.2016, respondent No.5, namely, the Superintendent of Police, Bhojpur at Ara, and respondent No.7, namely, the Station House Officer, Krishnagarh Police Station, are present, in person. In view of the fact that the sole accused, namely, Manoj Kumar Singh, has already surrendered in the court of

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.535 of 2016 (5) dt.03-10-2016 2/2 learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, at Ara, in connection with Complaint Case No.174(C) of 2000, no further order is called for on this writ petition.

This writ petition is, therefore, closed with liberty given to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and also take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

With the above observation, this writ petition stands disposed of.

Personal appearance of respondent No.5, namely, the Superintendent of Police, Bhojpur at Ara, and respondent No.7, namely, the Station House Officer, Krishnagarh Police Station, is dispensed with.

(I.A. Ansari, CJ) K.C.jha/- U T