Patna High CourtC. REV./188/2014disposed

Shailendra Kumar Sinha v. The Union Of India And ORS

2015-04-07Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.188 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2366 of 2013 ====================================================== Shailendra Kumar Sinha, Son of Sri Birendra Kumar Sinha, Resident of Krishnagan, Raja Bazar, P.S. - Shastri Nagar, District - Patna. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The Union of India, through Chairman, Central Board of Direct Taxes, New Delhi.

2. The Chairman, Central Board of Direct Taxes, New Delhi.

3. The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Revenue Building, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna.

4. Shri U.S. Agarwal, Additional Commissioner, Income Tax, Range - 6, Patna.

5. Smt. Bimla Kumari, Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(3), Patna.

6. Punjab National Bank, through it's Chairman.

7. The Deputy General Manager, Punjab National Bank, Chanakya Complex, Patna.

8. Sri Dipankar Choudhary, Raja Bazar Branch, Patna. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ravi Bhushan Prasad Verma, Advocate For the Income Tax Deptt : Mrs. Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi, Sr. Standing Counsel, Income Tax Deptt.

Ms. Vijaya Laxmi Srivastava, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 07-04-2015 We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks review of the order dated 3.2.2014 passed in C.W.J.C. No.2366 of 2013. We are not inclined to accede to the request. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his client may

Patna High Court C. REV. No.188 of 2014 (4) dt.07-04-2015 2/2 be granted liberty to represent his grievances before the Commissioner of Income Tax.

It is made clear that it would be open for the petitioner to represent his case before the Commissioner of Income Tax, who, in turn, may call for the records and take decision, depending upon his satisfaction.

The review application shall stand disposed of. The interlocutory application, if any, shall also stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. (L. Narasimha Reddy,CJ) (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) PNM U