Udesh Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15364 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-105 Year-2016 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Udesh Rai S/o Ramprit Rai, Resident of Village- Mirampur, P.S.- Raghopur, District- Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sheo Kumar Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akshay Lal Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 20-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 105 of 2016 for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 447, 341, 342, 323, 307, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioners, who is of clean antecedent, is innocent and has not committed any offence. There is admitted dispute between the parties relating to drainage system. Allegation against the petitioner is of assault by means of Garasa but there is no injury report on the record.

Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that petitioner is named accused in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15364 of 2019(3) dt.20-05-2019 2/2 the first information report and there is specific allegation of assault against him in which five persons have sustained injury. He, therefore, submits that petitioner does not deserve to be granted the privilege of anticipatory bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail of this petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is hereby rejected.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) ved/- U T