Ranjeet Yadav @ Ranjeet Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14272 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-490 Year-2018 Thana- MAIRWAN District- Siwan ====================================================== RANJEET YADAV @ RANJEET KUMAR YADAV Son of Dinanath Yadav Resident of Village - Navka Tola, P.S.- Mairwa, Distt - Siwan. At present Resident of Village - Lakharaw , P.S.- Siwan Muffasil. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Bijay Prakash Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Pushpa Sinha.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273, 308 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 30(a), 38(1) and 41 (1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. Allegation is of recovery of total 41.910 litre foreign liquor from a plastic bag which was being carried by petitioner and other co-accused on motorcycle. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case due to high handedness of police. Nothing has been recovered from his possession. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 22.12.2018.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14272 of 2019(2) dt.04-04-2019 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Mairwa P.S. Case No. 490 of 2018, with following condition:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence, after his release on bail, the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond.
(S. Kumar, J) manoj/- U T