← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4580/2019disposed

M/S Technoculture Building Centre Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Managing Director Sushma Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-03-08Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4580 of 2019 ====================================================== M/s Technoculture Building Centre Pvt. Ltd. through its Managing Director Sushma Kumari aged about 50 years, Gender Female, W/o Vinay Kumar Tiwary, R/o B Block Flat No.303 Nutan Tower Colony More, Near Krish Hundai, Main Road Kankarbagh, P.S. Lohiya Nagar, Kankarbagh, DistrictPatna ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Land Reform and Revenue Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

District Magistrate, Gaya 3.

Circle Officer, Manpur, District- Gaya ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Rishi Raj Sinha (Sc19) Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Sinha, AC to SC-19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-03-2019 Following is the relief, which the petitioner is seeking :- "That this is an application for issuance of writ in the nature of Mandamus for giving a direction to respondent no.3 to issue rent receipt of the lands appertaining to Khata No.266, Plot No.2269, 2264, Khata No.264, Plot No. 2274, Khata No.291, Plot No.2284, Khata No.309, Plot No.2267, 2277, 2245, Khata No.300, Plot No.2282 total area 8.80 acre situated in Mouza Kaiya, P.S. Mufasil, District Gaya, Thana No.292, Anchal Manpur, which have already been mutated and Jamabandi have been created after initiation of mutation proceeding case No.324/2013-14."

In my view, the petitioner has statutory remedy under

Patna High Court CWJC No.4580 of 2019(2) dt.08-03-2019 2/2 the provisions of Bihar Land Disputes Resolution Act, 2009, or Bihar Right to Public Services Act, 2011, which the petitioner may avail.

Such remedy being statutory in nature, the petitioner must avail such remedy.

This application is accordingly disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to avail the statutory remedy as may be advised. If the petitioner does so, the Court expects that the application of the petitioner shall be disposed of within the period of time as prescribed under the Act and the Rules framed thereunder.

This writ application stands disposed of accordingly. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Pawan/- U