Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15513 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-720 Year-2020 Thana- MOTIHARI TOWN District- East Champaran ====================================================== RAVI KUMAR Son of Ajay Prasad Resident of Village - West Gopalpur, P.s.- Motihari Town, Distt.- East Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Anil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Umanath Mishra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 457, 380 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.
The informant alleges that on 11.11.2020, he had taken his father to Patna for treatment and when he returned on 26.11.2020 to his house at Motihari, he came to know that a theft had taken place in their house during their absence, it is next alleged that T.V. and Rs. 30,000/- were stolen. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and has been falsely implicated in the present case, the F.I.R. was against unknown.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15513 of 2022(2) dt.20-09-2022 2/3 It is next submitted though the police alleges that the articles stolen were recovered from the house of the petitioner but then it is submitted that nothing was recovered from the house of the petitioner and the police has tried to falsely implicate the petitioner, it is next submitted that petitioner is a young boy aged about 22 years and lives in the same locality as that of the informant and as such he would not have even thought of committing such an act. Learned counsel next submits that since the petitioner is a young boy of 22 years of age with a clean antecedent and even if it is presumed what is alleged is true without admitting then sending him to jail would not serve any purpose rather he would come in contact with hardened criminals which will further jeopardize his entire career. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15513 of 2022(2) dt.20-09-2022 3/3 case is pending/successor court in connection with Motihari Town P.S. Case No. 720 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his father, Ajay Prasad.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T