Suraj v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25918 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-786 Year-2018 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada ====================================================== SURAJ Son of Md. Rauf Resident of Village- Pithori, Police StationAkbarpur, District- Nawada. At present Resident of Village- Bhadauni, Police Station- Nawada Town, District- Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 22-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is expected to honour his undertaking given in the instant case for depositing the requisite court fee and to remove the defect(s) as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363 and 365 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is a case of abduction of the victim, namely, Md. Ajmal @ Karu who is the son of the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that petitioner is not named in the FIR but after recovery of said victim, who stated in his statement recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. that the son of Pachiya

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25918 of 2021(2) dt.22-01-2022 2/2 Khatoon (petitioner) only said to shot fire. He further submits that there is no role of the petitioner in commission of abduction of the victim and the case has also been compromised between the parties.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Nawada, in connection with Nawada Town P.S. Case No. 786 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) brajesh kumar/- U T