← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16465/2022bail granted

Nago Mahto @ Nageshwar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2022-07-20Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16465 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-280 Year-2015 Thana- BAKHARI District- Begusarai ====================================================== NAGO MAHTO @ NAGESHWAR MAHTO Son of Boauma Mahto @ Rajendra Mahto Resident of Village - Shankarpur, P.s.- Bakhri, Distt.- Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arjun Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Lalan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-07-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code As per the prosecution case, when the informant was returning to his house on his motorcycle, three miscreants overtook the informant and at the gun point they committed loot of his belongings including the cash. During the course of all these actions they had covered their faces.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16465 of 2022(2) dt.20-07-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is accused in four other criminal cases as stated at para 3 of the bail petition. The name of the petitioner has sprung up during the course of investigation. The petitioner is in custody since 04.01.2022. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail-bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-VI, Begusarai, in connection with Bakhri P.S. Case No. 280 of 2015.

The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) shobhakri/- U T