Abdul Rahman v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.28049 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -175 Year- 2017 Thana -JANKINAGAR District- PURNIA ======================================================
1. Abdul Rahman S/o Late Md. Suleman, R/o Line Bazar, P.S.- Sahyak K. Hat, District- Purnia. At present Halka Karamchari, Halka No. 03, Anchal Banmankhi, District- Purnia.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhaskar Shankar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Sucheta Yadav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-05-2018 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Janki Nagar P.S. Case No. 175 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 504, 506, 406, 420, 468 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is that he got the receipt issued with respect to the land of the informant in favour of the other co-accused persons.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that after knowing the facts, he immediately cancelled the same receipt. He has been falsely implicated in the present case. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of offence and also that
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28049 of 2018 (2) dt.15-05-2018 2/3 petitioner has no criminal antecedent and only general and omnibus allegation has been levelled against him, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Purnia in connection with Janki Nagar P.S. Case No. 175 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28049 of 2018 (2) dt.15-05-2018 3/3 prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sushma/- U T