Arun Kumar v. The District Magistrate Kaimur District At Bhabua And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8459 of 2015 =========================================================== Arun Kumar Son of late Ram Gopal Mahesaria Proprietor of M/s Arunalay Flat No. E-107, Rajkishori Complex, Mulchand, Path, New Colony Chitragupta Nagar, Kankarbagh, Patna .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The District Magistrate Kaimur District at Bhabua
2. The Additional Collector, Kaimur Bhabua.
3. The Executive Officer Nagar Panchayat Kaimur District at Bhabua. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Dayal, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. N.K. SINGH, GP26 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 17-08-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the State.
2. This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Respondent No. 2 to make payment of the admitted dues of the petitioner amounting to Rs.64,977/-
3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that an amount of Rs. 64,977/- is outstanding in respect of supplies of stationery and other consumable items made by the petitioner and for which he has filed representation before the Respondent No. 2 which is said to be pending.
4. In view of the nature of the grievance of the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of with consent, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the Respondent No. 2 with a fresh
Patna High Court CWJC No.8459 of 2015 dt.17-08-2015 representation, who will examine the matter and take steps for payment of the admitted dues of the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. If the admitted amount is not paid to the petitioner within such period then he would be entitled for simple interest at the rate of 10% per annum to be calculated from the date it became due till the date of its final payment. It is further clarified that if the entire claim of the petitioner is not found admitted then he should be communicated the reasons for reaching such conclusion. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran U