Neeraj Ram @ Neeraj Kumar @ Niraj Kumar @ Niraj Ram @ Niraj Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15993 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-34 Year-2025 Thana- KUTUMBA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Neeraj Ram @ Neeraj Kumar @ Niraj Kumar @ Niraj Ram @ Niraj Kumar Ram S/o Jagdish Ram R/o Village - Erka, P.S - Kutumba, District - Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, Senior Advocate Ms. Sakshi Deep, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 10-04-2026 Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 320/2025/32/2025, arising out of Kutumba P.S. Case No. 34 of 2025, lodged on 26.02.2025, under Sections 103, 238, 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending before the Court of District & Additional Sessions Judge-VII, Aurangabad.
3. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the bail application of the petitioner has earlier been rejected vide order dated 06.08.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 36504 of 2025. Counsel further submits that on the previous occasion, a report regarding the present stage of the trial was
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15993 of 2026(3) dt.10-04-2026 2/2 called for. Counsel also submits that the petitioner has been in custody since 28.02.2025.
4. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that a report has been called for and, from the said report, it transpires that out of nine prosecution witnesses, three prosecution witnesses have been examined.
5. In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. Accordingly, the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Dr. Anshuman, J.) Aman Kumar/- U T