← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20357/2024bail granted

Suraj Pasi v. The State Of Bihar

2024-03-22Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20357 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-451 Year-2023 Thana- MIRGANJ District- Gopalganj ====================================================== SURAJ PASI SON OF SHIVJEE PASHI R/O-NARAINIA, P.S.-MIRGANJ, DISTT.-GOPALGANJ, BIHAR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sumit Shekhar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Indu Kumari Srivastava, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-03-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case.

4. Allegation is of recovery of 105.360 litres of liquor from a place outside the house of the petitioner.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even the alleged recovery is from a place which is adjacent to the house of the petitioner and he came to be implicated at the instance of the local people but then the name of the person who disclosed the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20357 of 2024(2) dt.22-03-2024 2/2 name of the petitioner is not disclosed in the FIR which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution. It is further submitted that if the local person was knowing about the involvement of the petitioner in the occurrence then why he did not inform the police prior to the institution of the instant FIR which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Mirganj P.S. Case No. 451 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T