Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23161/2017rejected

Vijay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-26Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23161 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -92 Year- 2015 Thana -RAMPUR District- GAYA ====================================================== Vijay Kumar, Son of Late Rajendra Prasad, Resident of Village- Tehta, P.S.- Tehta, District- Jehanabad.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr.

For the Opposite Party : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 26-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail which was earlier twice rejected vide order dated 18.01.2016 and 10.08.2016 passed in Cri. Misc. No. 48308 of 2015 and Cr. Misc. No. 30305 of 2016, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 06.04.2015 and he has been made victim of the circumstances, no one has seen him committing the crime and, as such, he deserves sympathetic consideration to which the learned A.P.P. opposes by submitting that the petitioner and deceased were taking the liquor and the dead body was recovered hidden in the bed of the petitioner and further one country made pistol and two empty cartridges were also recovered from the room of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23161 of 2017 (3) dt.26-07-2017 2/2 petitioner. Out of 14 witnesses 6 witnesses have already been examined and trial is in progress.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, at present, finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer of the bail, again prayer of the bail of the petitioner stands rejected in S.Tr. No. 08 of 2016 pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge VII, Gaya.

However, let the trial be expedited and concluded as early as possible, preferably within four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order after taking the same on priority basis, failing which the petitioner, if at no fault, may be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U