Arjun Yadav @ Arjun Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18364 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2019 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura ====================================================== 1.

ARJUN YADAV @ ARJUN KUMAR Son of Balmukund @ Bal Kukund Yadav Resident of Village - Garibtola, Ward No. 26, P.S. and District - Madhepura 2.

Santosh Kumar Son of Mukund Yadav @ Bal Kukund Yadav Resident of Village - Garibtola, Ward No. 26, P.S. and District - Madhepura 3.

Amar Kumar @ Amar @ Guddu Son of Arjun Yadav Resident of Village - Garibtola, Ward No. 26, P.S. and District - Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akshay Lal Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 27-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 324, 379, 504, 307/34 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act registered in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No. 30/2019.

3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the backdrop of land dispute and there is case and counter case between the parties. The injuries are simple in nature. The petitioners claim clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18364 of 2019(2) dt.27-03-2019 2/2 learned CJM, Madhepura, in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No. 30/2019 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions: i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners. ii. That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

iii. That the petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iv. The petitioners shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T