Ranjesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41053 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -339 Year- 2016 Thana -BAKHTIARPUR District- SAHARSA ======================================================

1. Ranjesh Yadav, Son of Jai Jai Ram Yadav, Resident of Village- Naya Tola P.S.- Bakhtiyarpur, Dist- Saharsa.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rana Randhir Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 339/2016, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 366 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected, vide order at Annexure-1, with a direction to the trial court to expedite the trial and conclude the same within a period of six months with liberty to the petitioner to move for bail if the trial is not concluded. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that in spite of expiry of seven months uptill now charge has not been framed at this stage and the petitioner is in custody since 02.11.2016 and he is ready to abide by any conditions imposed on him by the Hon'ble Court.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41053 of 2017 (3) dt.11-10-2017 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, it appears that there is no possibility of conclusion of the trial in future and the petitioner has remained in custody for 11 months, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No.

339/2016, subject to conditions that one of the bailors should be close relative of the petitioner and another having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court below and the petitioner will co-operate in disposal of the trial and will make himself available before the court and failure to appear on two consecutive dates without any appropriate reason will be liable for cancellation of his bail bond with further condition that he will make himself available before the police station of his area in first week of each months till conclusion of trial or for one year, so that police may watch his conduct, otherwise his bail bond shall be cancelled.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J.) Rakhi U T