Dindayal Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.28300 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -17 Year- 2018 Thana -GANGABRIDGE DistrictVAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Dindayal Rai S/o Suresh Rai, R/o Vill.- Karnpura, P.S.- Ganga Bridge, District- Vaishali.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Reena Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-05-2018 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Ganga Bridge P.S. Case No. 17 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of assaulting the informant by hasua causing injury on his wrist. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that prosecution case is false and concocted and he has falsely been made accused, however, the injury caused to the informant was found simple in nature and that too on wrist. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28300 of 2018 (2) dt.17-05-2018 2/2 period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Ganga Bridge P.S. Case No. 17 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T