Shashi Bhushan Poddar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16209 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -950 Year- 2014 Thana -PURNIA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPURNIA ====================================================== Shashi Bhushan Poddar son of Sri Premchand Poddar resident of village P.O. and P.S. Sursand Dist- Sitamarhi at present resident of B.H.U. Chhitupur Taranagar Colony, P.S. Lanka, Varanasi, U.P. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Archana Kumari daughter of Sri Dharmdeo Poddar at present residing C/O Sri Prabhat Kumar, Subhash Nagar, Polytechnic Chowk, Purnea, P.S.- K. Hat, Dist- Purnea .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Vivekanand Vivek, Advocate.

For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Nawal Kishore Pd.(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 30-04-2015 Heard both sides.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Complaint Case No. 950 of 2014, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A) and other Sections of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is the husband and he is ready to keep his wife. Learned counsel for the informant submits that the petitioner had kept a woman although she is willing to live with the petitioner, if the petitioner gives undertaking to keep her properly. Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner above named is directed to surrender in the court below within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16209 of 2015 (2) dt.30-04-2015 2/2 and the court below shall enlarge the petitioner on provisional bail, after issuing notice to the informant, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri Prashant Kumar, the Learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Purnea in connection with Complaint Case No. 950 of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and the court below shall make efforts for reconciliation between the husband and the wife. If the dispute is resolved, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner shall be confirmed and if the dispute does not resolve the court below shall pass order in accordance with law on the provisional bail of the petitioner.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.) KKSINHA/- U T