← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4624/2019disposed

Nisha Bharti v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-03-27Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4624 of 2019 ====================================================== Nisha Bharti, daughter of Nawal Kishore Bharti, resident of VillageKathauliya, P.O.-Birhima Bazar, P.S.-Baruraj, District-Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, Directorate of Integrated Child Development Scheme, Patna. 3.

The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

4.

The District Programme Officer, Muzaffarpur.

5.

The Block Development Officer, Motipur.

6.

The Child Development Project Officer, Motipur, Muzaffarpur. 7.

The Mukhiya Manguraha Tajpur Gram Panchayat, Motipur, Bareraj, Muzaffarpur.

8.

Mala Devi, wife of Ajay Sah, resident of Kathauliya, P.O.-Birhima Bazar, P.S-Barwaj, District-Muzaffarpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md. Shakir Ahmad For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Md.Raisul Haque (SC-10) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 27-03-2019 The petitioner, who was an applicant for being appointed as Anganbari Sevika, is aggrieved by the fact that despite her having obtained more marks than private respondent No. 8, she was placed at serial no. 1 in the merit list and has been appointed on the said post. A complaint in

Patna High Court CWJC No.4624 of 2019 dt.27-03-2019 2/3 that regard has been made by the petitioner before several authorities including the District Programme Officer, Muzaffarpur (respondent No. 4), but no action has been taken on such complaint.

2. Under the aforesaid circumstances, the petitioner is directed to make a detailed representation/complaint before the District Programme Officer, Muzaffarpur (respondent No. 4) afresh within a period of four weeks from today. On receipt of such representation/complaint, the District Programme Officer, Muzaffarpur (respondent No. 4) shall look into the matter, afford hearing to the concerned stake holders viz. the petitioner, private respondent No. 8 and any other candidate who would be the necessary party and pass orders in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks thereafter.

3. Should the petitioner feel aggrieved even thereafter, she would have the option of challenging the order of the District Programme Officer, Muzaffarpur (respondent No. 4) before the District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur (respondent No. 3).

Patna High Court CWJC No.4624 of 2019 dt.27-03-2019 3/3

4. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ petition stands disposed off.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) Shageer/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 01/04/2019