Patna High CourtCR. MISC./47448/2017bail granted

Anil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-10-12Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47448 of 2017 (2) dt.12-10-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47448 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -532 Year- 2017 Thana -DEHRI TOWN District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Anil Kumar, Son of Ramashish Singh @ Ramashish Yadav, Resident of Village- Lal Bangla Ward No.10, Gangauli, P.S.- Dehri (Dalmianagar), District- Rohtas.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt Pushpa Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-10-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Dehri (Dalmianagar) P.S. Case No. 532 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 41(1), 38(i)(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 140 litres of country made liquor.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that recovery has been made from five persons. Further submission is that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has sufficiently been punished for the said offence as he has been in judicial custody since 19.07.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47448 of 2017 (2) dt.12-10-2017 Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation and period of custody, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 02nd Additional Sessions Judge - cum- Special Court, Excise Act, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Dehri (Dalmianagar) P.S. Case No. 532 of 2017.

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T