Sona Jhari Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 800 of 2019 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 14995 of 2010 ====================================================== Sona Jhari Devi, aged about 54 years/female, Wife of Late Kapildeo Singh, Resident of Village-Karauti, P.S. Paliganj, District-Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

Ravi Shankar Chaudhary, District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Arwal. 3.

Mr. Rakesh Kumar, the District Magistrate cum Collector, Arwal. 4.

Mrs. Anju Singh, the Circle Officer, Arwal 5.

Tetari Devi, Wife of Raj Keshwar Singh.

6.

Parvati Devi Wife of Ram Jatan Singh.

7.

Lakho Devi Wife of Ishwar Dayal Singh.

8.

Fuleshwari Devi Wife of Ram Ashray Singh.

9.

Fulla Devi Wife of Late Hari Nandan Singh.

10.

Ram Jatan Singh, Son of Late Basudeo Singh.

11.

Ishwar Dayal Singh Son of Late Basudeo Singh. 12.

Ram Ashray Singh Son of Late basudeo Singh.

13.

Etwari Devi Wife of Devi Dayal Singh.

14.

Manju Devi Wife of Mukesh Yadav.

15.

Shyam Sundri Devi, Wife of Bipi Yadav.

16.

Satyander Yadav Son of Ramadhar Singh.

17.

Rajesh Yadav(Minor) Son of Satyendra Yadav, Minor under Guardianship of his Father, well Wisher and next friend of Satyendar Yadav. Respondents no. 5 to 17are Resident of Village- Abgila Tola Sukhibigha, P.S.- Rampur Chouran, District- Arwal.

18.

Budhan yadav, Son of Late Lakhan Yadav Resident of Village- Kansopur, P.S.- Arwal, District- Arwal.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Arun Kumar Bhagat, AC to AAG 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 30-07-2019 Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, learned counsel submitted

Patna High Court MJC No.800 of 2019(3) dt.30-07-2019 2/2 that Mr. Md. Shakir Ahmad, learned counsel on record for the petitioner has instructed him to withdraw the application.

2. In view thereof, as prayed for, the application stands disposed off as withdrawn.

3. However, It shall be open to the petitioner to challenge any order passed against him, in accordance with law, before the appropriate forum.

4. Learned counsel for the State is present.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar U