Patna High CourtCWJC/11169/2014dismissed

Anuradha Rani v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-12-06Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11169 of 2014 =========================================================== Anuradha Rani W/o Sona Lal Paswan resident of Village- Mushaharwa, PanchayatBhelahi, P.O- Bhelahi, P.S- Palanwa, District- East Champaran .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, social Welfare Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, the Integrated Child Development Services Deirectorate, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate, District East Champaran.

4. The Sub- Divisional Officer, Raxual, District- East Champaran

5. The Child Development Project Officer, Raxaul, District- East Champaran.

6. The District Programme Officer, Raxaul, District East Champaran.

7. The Memebrs of the Selection Committee, Ward No. 2, Centre Code no. Mini-I, Angan Bari Centre Mushaharwa, Panchayat-Bhelahi, District- East Champaran .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Giri, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. K. ALOK, SC 7.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 06-12-2017 The petitioner draws attention of the Court towards the merit list dated 9.12.2013, issued by respondent no.5 pursuant to which her application for appointment/engagement on the post of Anganbari Sevika in Ward No.2, Anganbari centre Musaharwa Centre code no.1, Panchayat Bhelahi, Police Station Palanwa, District East Champaran, has been rejected.

Counter affidavit has been filed by the State submitting that the petitioner's application has been rejected on the ground that one member of her family, being Bhabhi (sister-in-law) was an employee working as Panchayat teacher earning Rs.9,300/- from the Education

Patna High Court CWJC No.11169 of 2014 dt.06-12-2017 /2 Department. In this regard, he refers to the provisions contained in clause 4/4.9 of the Anganbari Sevika/Sahaika Selection Guidelines under which his candidature was ineligible for appointment. A copy of the same is as Annexure A to the counter affidavit. Clause 10/10.3 of the Guidelines provides the remedy of an appeal to the petitioner, which has not been availed by her.

In view of the above discussions, the writ petition is dismissed.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) Shashi.

NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date11.12.2017 Transmission Date NA