Raushan Singh And Others v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16195 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-225 Year-2022 Thana- SITAMARHI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.

Raushan Singh And Others Son Of Ram Niwash Singh Resident Of Village Dhanapur, Ps Kadar Chowk, District- Badayu, UP 2.

Kailash Singh Son Of Prakash Singh Resident Of Village Dhanapur, Ps Kadar Chowk, District- Badayu, UP 3.

Bhagirath Singh Son Of Jagdish Singh Resident Of Village Dhanapur, Ps Kadar Chowk, District- Badayu, UP 4.

Rajesh @Rajesh Kumar Son Of Dhanpat Jee Resident Of Village Dhanapur, Ps Kadar Chowk, District- Badayu, UP 5.

Ghanshyam Jatt Son Of Late Devkan Jatt Resident Of Village Dhanapur, Ps Kadar Chowk, District- Badayu, UP ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satrudhan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Choubey Jawahar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 01-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 399, 402, 414, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-b)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16195 of 2023(4) dt.01-08-2023 2/3

3. As per FIR, the allegation against the petitioners is of preparing for committing an offence and it is further alleged that several weapons including illegal arms and ammunition were also recovered from them. It is further stated that all petitioners belongs to Uttar Pradesh and they were staying in rental house of one Yogi Sah.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. They have committed no offence. The petitioners have no concern with the alleged arms and cartridges, which were seized by the police. Only on the basis of suspicion, petitioners have implicated in the present case by the police due to their criminal antecedents. They are languishing in judicial custody since 03.04.2022.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16195 of 2023(4) dt.01-08-2023 3/3 each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below in connection with Sitamarhi P.S. Case No. 225 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T