Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44714/2017bail granted

Pradeep Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-18Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44714 of 2017 (2) dt.18-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44714 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -275 Year- 2016 Thana -BARACHATTI District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Pradeep Chaudhary Son of Parmeshwar Chaudhary @ Prameshwar Pasi, Resident of Village- Kedlikal, P.S.- Hunterganj, District- Chatra (Jharkhand).

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rajendra Prasad Nat ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-09-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Barachatti P.S. Case No. 275 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 272, 273 and 120(B) of Indian Penal Code and Section 47(a) of the Bihar Excise (Amendment ) Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 72 litres of country made wine.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and not named in the F.I.R. Further he has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 27.07.2017 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44714 of 2017 (2) dt.18-09-2017 circumstances of the case and as petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 27.07.2017, as such, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court of Special Judge, Excise, Gaya, in connection with Barachatti P.S. Case No. 275 of 2016.

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T