Raj Narayan Prasad @ Madan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18069 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-176 Year-2022 Thana- KARAKAT District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

RAJ NARAYAN PRASAD @ MADAN PRASAD S/O LATE RAMESHWAR PRASAD Resident of Village- Gorari, P.S.- Karakt (Gorari), District- Rohtas 2.

BINDA DEVI W/O RAJ NARAYAN PRASAD @ MADAN PRASAD Resident of Village- Gorari, P.S.- Karakt (Gorari), District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajani Kant Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 27-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per allegation in the FIR, petitioners along with other family members have tortured in various ways to the daughter of the informant and ultimately she was being killed by them.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are father-in-law and mother-inlaw of the deceased and has been falsely implicated in this case. They have never demanded any thing from the deceased. They

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18069 of 2023(3) dt.27-06-2023 2/2 are living separately and they have no concern with the mess and business of the deceased and her husband. The sole responsibility to take care of wife is upon husband and not against his family members. Husband is in custody. Petitioners are languishing in judicial custody since 31.01.2023. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-16, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with S.T. No. 87 of 2023 arising out of Karakat PS Case No. 176 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U