Jai Prakash Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.37795 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -446 Year- 2016 Thana -BAGHA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== Jai Prakash Ram Son of Dhrup Ram, R/o Village- Goroyapatti, P.S.- Bagaha, District- West Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kr Singh No. 1 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 10-08-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Bagaha P.S. Case No. 446 of 2016 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The case of the informant, in short, is that her husband used to go to market for selling eggs and when he did not return by 12 in the night, she went out to search for her husband and found her grand son carrying her husband near the Karbistan. The informant stated that when she reached there, she found that her husband was bleeding and thereafter he died. It is alleged that the accused persons, namely, Hasrat Khan, Mazaharul Khan and Ibrahim Khan had killed her husband on account of animosity arising out of love affair of her grand son with the wife of Hasrat

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37795 of 2017 (2) dt.10-08-2017 2/2 Khan.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not been named in the F.I.R., he has got no role to play in the alleged occurrence and the bail petition of said Hasrat Khan has already been rejected. It is further submitted that though there are three cases pending against the petitioner, but he has been acquitted in one case and in two cases he is on bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it fit and proper to enlarge the petitioner on regular bail.

Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Bagaha, District West Champaran in connection with Bagaha P.S. Case No. 446 of 2016.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) BTiwary/- U T