Ranjit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15278 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-114 Year-2025 Thana- Shahartelpa P.S. District- Arwal ====================================================== Ranjit Kumar Son of Butan Bind R/o Village - Shahar Telpa, P.S. - Shahar Telpa, Dist. - Arwal.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ranjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 11-03-2026 Heard Mr. Ranjay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 29.11.2025, in connection with Shahar Telpa P.S. Case No. 114 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 28.11.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 303(2), 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he has assaulted to the brother of the informant by means of lathi due to which he sustained injuries.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15278 of 2026(2) dt.11-03-2026 2/3 the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. As per allegation in the F.I.R., the petitioner has assaulted to the brother of the informant by means of lathi and he has received injuries. Although he has received two injuries, one injury is on hand and another injury is on the head, one injury which is grievous in nature due to fracture in hand and another injury which is on the head is simple in nature. He further submits that the police after investigation submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 29.11.2025.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner carries one more case other than the present one.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the injury inflicted upon the injured person is grievous in nature but the same is on hand which is not on the vital part of the body, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District & Sessions Judge-I, Arwal in connection with Shahar Telpa P.S. Case No. 114 of 2025,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15278 of 2026(2) dt.11-03-2026 3/3 subject to the following conditions :-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T