Triloki Singh@ Triloki Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15972 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-605 Year-2020 Thana- ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictRohtas ====================================================== Triloki Singh@ Triloki Kumar Singh, Son Of Paras Singh, Resident Of Village - Amiyawar, P.S. - Nasriganj, Distt. - Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Puja Kumari Wife of Triloki Singh Resident Of Village - Amiyawan, P.S. - Nasriganj, Distt. - Rohtas, Present Address:- Puja Kumari, D/o Ramesh Singh, R/v Babhni, P.S. Karghar, District - Rohtas ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jai Narain Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 25-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner apprehends arrest in Complaint Case No. 605 of 2020, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 498(A) of Indian Penal Code and Section 4 D.P. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will make all genuine efforts to reconcile the issue so that the reconciliation culminates in restoration of matrimonial harmony or one time settlement as may be agreed upon between the petitioner and the complainant/opposite party No.2. In view of the said submission since terms of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15972 of 2023(2) dt.25-05-2023 2/2 reconciliation has to be worked out, this Court would direct that if the petitioner surrenders in the court below, i,.e. the Court of learned S.D.J.M, Rohtas at Sasaram, within a period of four weeks from today, in connection with Complaint Case No. 605 of 2020 and submits an undertaking to this effect at the time of his surrender, the court below, after issuing notice to Opposite party No. 2 (wife) will grant provisional bail to the petitioner for a period of three months. The parties would make attempt to work out an amiable resolution of the dispute and the matter would be reviewed by the court below after three months. This court makes it clear that if the issue is resolved amicably, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner should be confirmed. If the developments are, however otherwise, the court below would be free to pass orders in exercise of its judicial discretion, including cancellation of the provisional bail granted to the petitioner.

With the aforesaid observations the application stands disposed of.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) shyambihari/- U T