Munna Paswan @ Munna Don v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.37920 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -25 Year- 2017 Thana -LAHERIMUHALLA District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ====================================================== Munna Paswan @ Munna Don Son of Chandradeo Paswan Resident of Village/Mohalla - Manichak, P.S. - Deep Nagar, District - Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 22-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 07.06.2017 in connection with Laheri P.S. Case No. 25 of 2017 for the offences alleged under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on mere suspicion and the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. Petitioner's name has surfaced on the confessional statement of co-accused Pankaj Kumar @ Gora @ Gendra and Suraj Kumar, both of whom have been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 26684 of 2017 and Cr. Misc. No. 35936 of 2017 respectively. No recovery has been made from the conscious possession of the petitioner.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37920 of 2017 (3) dt.22-09-2017 Biharsharif, in connection with Laheri P.S. Case No. 25 of 2017, on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/Chandran U T