← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16402/2023allowed

Amit Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

2023-06-26Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16402 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-211 Year-2021 Thana- RUNISAIDPUR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.

AMIT THAKUR Son of Raj Kishor Thakur R/V- Kouriya P.S- Runnisaidpur Dist- Sitamarhi 2.

Jaimangal Rai Son of Jinish Rai R/V- Kouriya P.S- Runnisaidpur DistSitamarhi 3.

Ram Pukar Rai Son of Jinish Rai R/V- Kouriya P.S- Runnisaidpur DistSitamarhi 4.

Hirba Rai Son of Jinish Rai R/V- Kouriya P.S- Runnisaidpur Dist- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 26-06-2023 Heard the parties.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 325/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioners is that they assaulted the informant's side by deadly weapons due to which they got injured. It is also alleged that the petitioners snatched important documents as well as cash from the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. No such

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16402 of 2023(3) dt.26-06-2023 2/2 occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is no specific overt act against the petitioners. He further submits that as per the injury report, the injuries have been found to be simple in nature. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No.211 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T