Surendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19901 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-148 Year-2022 Thana- MAGADH UNIVERSITY District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Surendra Yadav S/O Vijay Yadav Resident Of Village- Dadpur, P.S.- Magadh University District- Gaya.

2.

Satendra Yadav S/O Vijay Yadav Resident Of Village- Dadpur, P.S.- Magadh University District- Gaya.

3.

Shankar Yadav S/O Late Bechu Yadav Resident Of Village- Dadpur, P.S.- Magadh University District- Gaya.

4.

Dharmendra Yadav @ Dharmendra Kumar S/O Birju Yadav Resident Of Village- Dadpur, P.S.- Magadh University District- Gaya. 5.

Sonu @ Jhaman Yadav S/O Birju Yadav Resident Of Village- Dadpur, P.S.- Magadh University District- Gaya.

6.

Manoj Yadav S/O Birju Yadav Resident Of Village- Dadpur, P.S.- Magadh University District- Gaya.

7.

Chandra Yadav @ Chandan Kumar S/O Kesho Yadav Resident Of VillageDadpur, P.S.- Magadh University District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sudhir Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satyendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 16-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 379, 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Petitioners are said to have assaulted the informant by means of lathi, danda.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19901 of 2023(4) dt.16-08-2023 2/2 the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides have sustained injury. He submits that the injury found upon the victim is simple in nature. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He further submits that petitioners have criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Magadh University P.S. Case No. 148 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438

(2) of the Cr.P.C.

devendra/- (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) U T