Patna High CourtCR. MISC./17273/2020dismissed

Jaleshwar Sah @ Jaleshar Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2020-05-15Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17273 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2020 Thana- KATEYA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== JALESHWAR SAH @ JALESHAR SAH Son of Ram Nath Sah Resident of Village-Bhagwanpur, P.S.-Kateya, District-Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dhramveer, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Madan Kumar,APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 15-05-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through video conference.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 14.01.2020 in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 08 of 2020 for the alleged offences under Sections 341, 323, 307 IPC as well as Section 37(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on the allegation that the petitioner came in drunken condition and assaulted the informant's minor daughter aged about 9 years with knife on her head when she was playing on the road, causing injury. The allegations are denied by the petitioner, submitting that the informant's daughter sustained injury when she fell on the road and hit her head on some sharp

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17273 of 2020(2) dt.15-05-2020 2/2 object. No prior dispute, enmity or any other motive has been assigned to the petitioner, who claims clean antecedents.

4. Learned APP appears and opposes the bail petition, submitting on the basis of the order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge II that the informant's daughter has sustained injury on the left side of her head caused by sharp cutting weapon and was grievous in nature.

5. Having regard to the nature of accusations and gravity of offence alleged, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T