Dhanwanti Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29984 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -200 Year- 2017 Thana -HAJIPUR SADAR DistrictVAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Dhanwanti Devi W/o Santosh Rai, R/o Vill.- Dighi East , P.S.- Sadar Hajipur, District- Vaishali.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nachiketa Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nityanand Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-05-2018 Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was dismissed thrice vide order dated 31.08.2017 passed in Cr. Misc No. 37785 of 2017, vide order dated 11.10.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 49062 of 2017 as well as vide order dated 17.01.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 65 of 2018.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that save and except confessional statement of co-accused there is nothing against the petitioner and she is a lady and has been in judicial custody since 15.05.2017 and other co-accused on whose confession name of the petitioner surfaced has already been enlarged on bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 11.01.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 59422 of 2017. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts as well as in view of the fact that one of the co-accused of this case

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29984 of 2018 (2) dt.16-05-2018 2/2 has already been enlarged on bail, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge -VIIIth, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Hazipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 200 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T