Govind Mahto v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7049 of 2015 ====================================================== Govind Mahto Son of Radha Krishna Mahto, Resident of village- Chauhatta, P.S. Manpur, District West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar 2.
The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna 3.
The Deputy Inspector General of Police Administration, Bihar, Patna. 4.
The Commandant, Bihar Military Police - 6, Muzaffarpur. 5.
The Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna- 14 through its Secretary 6.
The Chairman, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna- 14 7.
The Secretary, Staff Selection Commission, Patna- 1 ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Md. Anisur Rahman For the State :
Mr.Mirtunjay Kumar, AC to AAG6 ForSSC Mr. S.S. Sundram ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 23-04-2019 At the very outset, counsel for the petitioner submits that relying upon decision of the Apex Court in the case of Avtar Singh vs. Union of India & others reported in 2016(8) SCC 471, he would be approaching respondent no.3 for reconsideration of his case in the light of law having regard to various parameters which are required to be considered in a case where employment of the petitioner is terminated on the ground of suppression or misrepresentation in respect of pending criminal proceeding at the time of obtaining employment. In view of said submission, consideration has to be
Patna High Court CWJC No.7049 of 2015(3) dt.23-04-2019 2/2 done by the authority having regard to law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Avtar Singh (supra). No useful purpose would be served by keeping writ petition pending. Petitioner will make detailed representation before respondent no.3 (Deputy Director General of Police {Administration}, Bihar, Patna) within four weeks. In the event, such representation is filed, the same shall be disposed off by reasoned and speaking order within three months thereafter. Earlier order dated 10.3.2010 passed by respondent no.3 shall not stand in the way of fresh consideration.
Writ petition is disposed off.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J) s.hassan/- U