Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18129 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-566 Year-2023 Thana- FATEHPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== RAHUL KUMAR SON OF LALAN YADAV @ LALAN PRASAD RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - MANIK BIGHA, P.S. - FATEHPUR, DISTRICT - GAYA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Yogesh Chandra Verma, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Vijay Anand, Adv.

Mr. Roop Kishan, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 29-03-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The learned Senior counsel for the petitioner Mr. Yogesh Chandra Verma submits that initially the case was instituted under sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code but the police after investigation submitted charge sheet under section 306 of the Indian Penal Code. It is also submitted that it is a case of false implication, as the father of the deceased along with her uncle had signed on the inquest report, which was prepared prior to institution of the instant F.I.R. but then no such allegation was alleged. It is also submitted that the allegation of assault and torture is there but then the police after threadbare

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18129 of 2024(2) dt.29-03-2024 2/2 investigation came to a conclusion that the case is of suicide.

3. At this stage, after making such submission, the learned Senior counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application.

4. Permission is accorded.

5. The anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T