Sahid @ Raj @ Sahid Raj v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16828 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-356 Year-2021 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Sahid @ Raj @ Sahid Raj Son Of Md. Jalil Khalifa Resident Of Village - Madarpur Naya Tola, P.S. - Hajipur Sadar Desari, District - Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Vasant Vikas For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 26-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 356 of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 457/380 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur.
As per prosecution case, on 02.04.2021 informant received information that the lock of his house has been broken and valuable articles has been stolen with Rs. 13,00,000/- (Rupees Thirteen lakh) cash.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16828 of 2023(3) dt.26-06-2023 2/2 specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R., the name of the petitioner came in this case on the basis of suspicion. He further submits that no theft articles or cash have been recovered from the petitioner or his house. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes prayer for anticipatory bail. He submits that petitioner is involved in the present case. He also submits that in the case diary this fact is given that the petitioner was fled away from the place of the occurrence from 01.04.2023.
Considering the facts and circumstances of case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Ayush/- U T