Chandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15671 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-474 Year-2018 Thana- DINARA District- Rohtas ====================================================== CHANDAN KUMAR, S/o Dilip Singh, Resident of Village-Jigna, Police Station-Dinara, District-Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Amarendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-03-2019 Petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Dinara P.S. Case No. 474 of 2018, registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 112 litres of liquor from the paddy field.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the paddy field does not belong to the petitioner and nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession and though he is accused in one more case but that that does not relate to Excise case and in seizure list there is no independent witness, rather police officials have been made witnesses to that. Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and in the facts and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15671 of 2019(2) dt.26-03-2019 2/2 circumstances, let petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the receipt of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Excise, Rohtas, in connection with Dinara P.S. Case No. 474 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of the court concerned. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T