Sahdeo Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15210 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-177 Year-2023 Thana- BHARGAMA District- Araria ====================================================== Sahdeo Yadav Son of Jago Yadav Resident of Village- Raghunath Pur Uttar, P.S.-Bhargama, Distt.- Araria, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nishant Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pranav Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 10-04-2025 Heard Mr. Nishant Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Pranav Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 177 of 2023, F.I.R. dated 02.07.2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 457, 380, 411, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 02.07.2023 at 10:30 P.M. the informant was sleeping and when he heard some noise and awoke and saw 4-5 boys taking out box etc. from the house and after raising halla one boy was caught namely Manoj Kumar and others succeeded to flee away. On inquiry, he averred that Sahdeo, Jabbar, Badal and Munna were other persons who taken mobile and cash from the house.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15210 of 2025(2) dt.10-04-2025 2/3 petitioner has clean antecedent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the name of the petitioner has been transpired on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused person who was arrested at the spot and except the aforesaid, no other cogent material has come during investigation to suggest the involvement of the petitioner in the present occurrence.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the petitioner having clean antecedent and the name of the petitioner has been transpired on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused person, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 177 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/ Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023 and with other following conditions :-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15210 of 2025(2) dt.10-04-2025 3/3

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T