Ramjan Hasmi @ Ramjan Alam v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20627 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-383 Year-2024 Thana- MANJHI District- Saran ====================================================== Ramjan Hasmi @ Ramjan Alam son of Manjoor Hasmi Resident of villageChubah Sthan, Manjhi Thana Bazar, PS- Manjhi, District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Rajeshwar Prasad Son of Dhrup Prasad Resident of village- Manjhi Thana Bazar, PS- Manjhi, District- Saran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Anjani Parashar , Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Meena Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State .
2. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 137 ( 2 ) and 96 of BNS.
3 . The prosecution case in brief, is that informant namely Rajesheshwar Prasad alleges that his minor daughter, Anushka Kumari aged about 13 years was kidnapped on 18.11.2024 at around 4:00 AM by the petitioner and his friend Raja Hasmi under a pre - planned conspiracy . It is further alleged that cash of Rs. 1,50,000/- five sets of gold ornaments
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20627 of 2025(3) dt.07-07-2025 2/3 and one set of silver ornaments were missing from the house .
4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged. As per F.I.R. date of occurrence is 18.11.20245 but F.I.R. has been lodged on 29.11.2024 i. e,. after the delay of 12 days for which there is no plausible explanation . It is further submitted that the victim was recovered and she in her statement recorded under section 183 BNSS has denied the factum of kidnapping and has stated that no one has kidnapped her rather she had gone to house of aunt ( fua) . Medical board has assessed the age of victim between 17 to 19 years. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.
5 . Learned counsel for the State opposed the bail petition .
6 Considering the statement of victim under section 183 BNSS, clean antecedent of the petitioner and other circumstances of the case , in the event of arrest or surrender within eight weeks from today, let the petitioner, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM 11th Saran at Chapra in connection with Manjhi P.S. Case No. 383 of 2024 ,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20627 of 2025(3) dt.07-07-2025 3/3 subject to the conditions laid down under section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 .
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T