Ranju Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17496 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-260 Year-2023 Thana- PANCHRUKHI District- Siwan ====================================================== Ranju Devi, W/O Dharmendra Bhagat @ Dharmendra Prasad R/O VillageHarpur, P.S- Pachrukhi, Distt.- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/S
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Bijay Prakash Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Yogendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 27-03-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a woman and has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant with an allegation that petitioner assaulted Kishori Devi, the mother in-law of the informant with Daab on head causing injury.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17496 of 2024(2) dt.27-03-2024 2/3
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that no doubt, the injury suffered by Kishori Devi is grievous in nature, but then, the blow was not repeated. It is also submitted that petitioner is alleged to have assaulted Kishori Devi with Daab, but then, the injury report records that the injury was caused by hard and blunt substance. It is thus submitted that since the dispute was going on in between the side of the petitioner and the informant, as such, even the petitioner had instituted Pachrukhi P. S. Case No.261 of 2023. It is further submitted that the entire family members of the petitioner have been implicated. It is also submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting, then the injury is not caused by sharp cutting weapon and the blow was not repeated and petitioner is a woman.
5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, abovenamed, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17496 of 2024(2) dt.27-03-2024 3/3 to be released on bail on her furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Siwan in connection with Pachrukhi P. S. Case No.260 of 2023, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T