Shatrughna Rai @ Satrudhan Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18436 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-460 Year-2020 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

SHATRUGHNA RAI @ SATRUDHAN RAY Son of Late Mithu Rai Resident of village - Jamuna Tola, P.S.- Chapra Muffasil, District - Saran (Chapra).

2.

Munna Rai Son of Shatrughna Rai Resident of village - Jamuna Tola, P.S.- Chapra Muffasil, District - Saran (Chapra).

3.

Subash Rai Son of Shatrughna Rai Resident of village - Jamuna Tola, P.S.- Chapra Muffasil, District - Saran (Chapra).

4.

Gobind Rai @ Gobinda Rai Son of Shatrughna Rai Resident of village - Jamuna Tola, P.S.- Chapra Muffasil, District - Saran (Chapra). 5.

Bharat Rai Son of Late Punyadeo Rai Resident of village - Kewani, P.S.- Garkha, District - Saran (Chapra).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Brij Kishor Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kumar Ranjit Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 307, 379 and some other ancillary Sections of the Indian Penal Code. As per the prosecution case, all the accused persons armed with Lathi and Danda came and assaulted the informant and his two sons and also snatched mobile of the informant. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18436 of 2022(2) dt.30-08-2022 2/2 that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the case. It is further submitted that both parties are Gotias and allegation of assault is general and omnibus. Petitioners have got clean antecedent.

Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the facts of the case and clean antecedent of the petitioners, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest/ surrender within a period of six weeks from today shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial MagistrateIX, Saran at Chapra in connection with Chapra Muffasil PS case No. 460/ 2020, subject to conditions laid down u/s 438(2) of the Cr. P. C.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) BKS/- U T