Chhotu Jha @ Chitranjan Jha v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15695 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2015 Thana- GOGRI District- Khagaria ====================================================== 1.
CHHOTU JHA @ CHITRANJAN JHA Son of Late Uma Kant Jha Resident of Sirniya, P.S.- Gogri, District - Khagaria. 2.
Ajit Kumar Jha Son of Late Uday Kant Jha Resident of Sirniya, P.S.- Gogri, District - Khagaria.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Vikas Ratan Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ashok Kumar, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 21-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The informant alleges that on 21.01.2014, he had given Rs. 3,00,000/- to Milind Jha for one Bigha of land after negotiation for purchasing the same for the which Milind Jha signed on a stamp paper but till date he has not given the land and thus has cheated the informant.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and have been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15695 of 2022(2) dt.21-09-2022 2/2 petitioner no. 1 is relative of Milind Jha and petitioner no. 2 is own brother of Milind Jha. Learned counsel next submits that the dispute is purely civil in nature and in the event if the informant is aggrieved by the act of Milind Jha, he has remedies available in law for seeking a direction from the court of competent jurisdiction against Milind Jha for executing the sale deed.
Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Gogri P.S. Case No. 39 of 2015 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) gauravkr/- U T