Chandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15845 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-135 Year-2025 Thana- MINAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Chandan Kumar Son of Rakesh Prasad Resident of Village - Gadaichak, P.S. - Minapur, Dist. - Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dr. Bipin Chandra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Minapur P.S. Case No. 135 of 2025 dated 21.04.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 309(6) of B.N.S.

3. As per the allegation, the informant and his friends were going from Ganj Bazar to Madadeiya, in the meantime, three persons waylaid the informant and snatched total cash amount of Rs. 1500/- and a motorcycle. It has been alleged that the accused persons were driving the motorcycle bearing no. BR06D-6637 and the two persons were talking among themselves as Abhay and Chandan.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15845 of 2026(3) dt.11-05-2026 2/3

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that the motorcycle used in the crime does not belong to the petitioner. It has further been submitted that merely on the basis of material that two accused persons were talking themselves as Abhay and Chandan, there is no material against the petitioner. It has further been submitted that no test identification parade has been conducted against the petitioner. It has further been submitted that there is no recovery of any incriminating article from the possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has lastly submitted that petitioner is in custody since 07.11.2025 and although petitioner has been made accused in five other cases in which he is on bail.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Heard the parties and perused the record.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of material against the petitioner, the petitioner above-named is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15845 of 2026(3) dt.11-05-2026 3/3 Court concerned, Muzaffarpur in connection with Minapur P.S. Case No. 135 of 2025.

8. The application stands allowed.

(Praveen Kumar, J) shivam/- U T