Kailash Uraon v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26468 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-80 Year-2020 Thana- ADHAOURA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== 1.
Kailash Uraon Son Of Late Dasha Urawn R/O Village- Haraiadih, P.S.- Nauhatta, Dist.- Rohtas At Sasaram 2.
Ram Keshwar Uraon @ Ramkesar Uraon Son Of Late Budhan Urawn R/O Village- Haraiadih, P.S.- Nauhatta, Dist.- Rohtas At Sasaram ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Pawan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Satyadev Pd. Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-07-2021 This matter is taken up for consideration through Video Conferencing under the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice.
Heard both parties.
The petitioners seek bail in Adhaura P.S. Case No. 80 of 2020, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a, 25(1-aa), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. As per the prosecution case, one country made pistol and equipments for manufacturing arms have been recovered from the hut of petitioners.
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that nothing has been recovered from possession of these petitioners.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26468 of 2021(2) dt.30-07-2021 2/2 Recovery has been made from the hut which is in joint possession of family. Petitioners are in custody since 07.12.2020 having clean antecedent.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners above-named, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with Adhaura P.S. Case No. 80 of 2020, subject to following conditions:- (i) The petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, their bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.
(ii) If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T