Md. Ehsan @ Aehsan Ali v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14079 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-234 Year-2019 Thana- BHARGAMA District- Araria ====================================================== 1.

MD. EHSAN @ AEHSAN ALI Son of Md. Usman Resident of VillageKhajuri Milik, Ward No. 06, P.S.- Bhargama, District- Araria. 2.

Md. Sadrul Son of Late Safid Mian Resident of Village- Khajuri Milik, Ward No. 06, P.S.- Bhargama, District- Araria.

3.

Md. Sabban Son of Md. Sadrul Resident of Village- Khajuri Milik, Ward No. 06, P.S.- Bhargama, District- Araria.

4.

Md. Diljan Son of Md. Sadrul Resident of Village- Khajuri Milik, Ward No. 06, P.S.- Bhargama, District- Araria.

5.

Md. Miskim Son of Md. Sadrul Resident of Village- Khajuri Milik, Ward No. 06, P.S.- Bhargama, District- Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jai Shanker Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pradeep Narain Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 03-07-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 234 of 2019 for the offence registered under Sections 341, 342, 323, 324, 307, 427, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14079 of 2020(2) dt.03-07-2020 2/2 been implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the prayer of the petitioner no.1. He submits that on perusal of first information report, it appears that there is direct allegation of farsa blow against petitioner no.1, Md. Ehsan at the head of the informant with intention to kill him. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State, the application for grant of anticipatory bail of petitioner no.1 Md. Ehsan @ Aehsan Ali is rejected. Let the above named petitioner nos.

2 to 5 be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing personal bail bond to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Araria in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 234 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) shailendra/- U T