Mostt.Gangajala Kuer v. State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6662 of 1995 =========================================================== Mostt. Gangajala Kuer widow of late Sarju Paney resident of village-Khurmabad, P.S. and Anchal-Chenari, Distirct-Rohtas.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Deputy Director, Consolidation, Head Quarter, Patna.

3. Deputy Director, Consolidation, Rohtas, Sasaram.

4. The Consolidation Officer, Rohtas.

5. Tirbeni Pandey son of late Shambhu Pandey.

6. Ram Sumer Pandey.

7. Ram Nagina Pandey.

8. Rajgirihi Pandey.

9. Ayodhya pandey sl.6 to 9 are sons of late Guput Pandey.

10. Most. Indrasani Widow of late Kamta Pandey.

11. Rameshwar Pandey son of late Shyam Bihari Pandey, all resident of Khurmabad P.S. and Anchal Chenari, District-Rohtas. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hari Ji Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. Shiva Nand Pathak For the Respondent/s : Mr. (GP2) Mr. A.S.Jha Mr. Lakshmanlal Pandey Mr. Ranjan Kr. Dubey Mr. Ravi Shankar Dvivedi Mr. Shailendra Kr.Dubey Mr. Ghansham Pandey Mr. (Ga2) =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 30-04-2015 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner in spite of repeated calls for hearing. Mr. Rakesh Chandra, the learned counsel

Patna High Court CWJC No.6662 of 1995 dt.30-04-2015 for the respondent nos. 8, 9 and 10 is present. No one has also appeared on behalf of the other respondents.

Mr. Chandra, the learned counsel for the respondents has pointed out that interlocutory application (I.A. No. 47 of 2014) has been filed on behalf of the respondents stating that the sole writ petitioner died in the year 1997 itself. It has been further stated in the said interlocutory application that no steps for substitution has been taken and there is no writ petitioner at present in this writ application. It also transpires from the order dated 01.04.2015 that Mr. Om Prakash Upadhyay, advocate has assured to this Court for filing Vakalatnama within two weeks.

As, there is no writ petitioner in this writ application, the same is dismissed as incompetent.

(V. Nath, J) Devendra/- U