Mukesh Kumar v. The North Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4515 of 2024 ====================================================== 1.

Mukesh Kumar Son of Yadunandan Rai Resident of Ward No. 03, Kurmi Tola, Karrakh, Sakhmohan, Samastipur, Police Station-Sakhmohan, DistrictSamastipur. 2.

Sanjeev Kumar Son of Baidnath Paswan Resident of Ward No. 06, Cheriyabariyarpur, Siripur, Police Station-Cheriyabariyarpur, DistrictBegusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The North Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited through its Managing Director, Vidyut Bhawan, Patna.

2.

The Managing Director, Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Patna.

3.

The Deputy General Manager (Personnel), Vidyut Bhawan, Patna. 4.

The Electrical Superintending Engineer, Electric Supply Circle, Samastipur. 5.

The Electrical Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division, Begusarai. 6.

The Assistant Electrical Engineer, Electric Supply Sub-Division, Manjhaul, Begusarai.

7.

The Junior Electrical Engineer, Electric Supply Section, Manjhaul, Begusarai.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajey Kumar, Advocate For the NBPH :

Mr. Anand Kumar, Advocate Mr. Rajan Prakash, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 04-04-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "That this is an application for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing/commanding the Respondents to pay emoluments on regular basis after giving posting to the petitioners on their duties without any further delay as they

Patna High Court CWJC No. 4515 of 2024(2) dt.04-04-2024 2/2 had been serving Respondents as Line men (Manav Bal) since 18.06.2014 though juniors to them are being allowed to perform duties and getting regular payment ignoring the representation of petitioners."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioners to approach the respondent-authorities for redressal of their aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands disposed off as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U