← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23220/2025bail granted

Bulet Ravidas v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-30Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23220 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2024 Thana- MALAYPUR District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.

Bulet Ravidas S/o- Late Raj Kumar Ravidas Village- Dewachak Ps-Barhat Dist- Jamui 2.

Dilip Ravidas S/o- Late Raj Kumar Ravidas Village- Dewachak Ps-Barhat Dist- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Yogendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-04-2025 Heard Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Yogendra Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Malaypur P.S. Case No. 95 of 2024 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 126(2), 115, 352, 351(2), 109, 118(2), 3(5) of the BNS.

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the petitioners, along with one co-accused Bhagirath Ravidas, had assaulted the informant (Manoj Ravidas), as well as, one person namely Rakesh Ravidas, as a result of which they sustained injuries.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23220 of 2025(2) dt.30-04-2025 2/3

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in the present case. The co-accused Bhagirath Ravidas has been released on bail. Allegation against the petitioners is that they had assaulted the informant, as well as, one person namely Rakesh Ravidas and as per the opinion of the Doctor, the injury sustained on the body of the informant has been found to be simple in nature and is lacerated not sharp. On these grounds, the petitioners seek to be released on pre-arrest bail.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

6. Considering the nature of allegation made in the FIR, as well as, the fact that injury sustained by the informant is simple in nature and is lacerated not sharp, I am of the opinion that petitioners have, prima facie, made out a case to be released on pre-arrest bail.

7. The petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23220 of 2025(2) dt.30-04-2025 3/3 amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Malaypur P.S. Case No. 95 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and if it is found that the petitioners are involved in some other cases, as what has been stated in paragraph No.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force. (Purnendu Singh, J) Ashishsingh/- U T