Singhasan Giri @ Singhasan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15348 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-352 Year-2025 Thana- DARIYAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.
Singhasan Giri @ Singhasan Kumar S/O Sanjay Giri Resident of VillageMath Chilawa Police Station- Dariyapur, District-Saran 2.
Sukesh Giri S/O Sanjay Giri Resident of Village-Math Chilawa Police Station- Dariyapur, District-Saran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr. Shakti Suman Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Ms. Gulnar Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-07-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S..
3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that on 31.05.2025, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, came at the house of informant and assaulted informant and his family members. Petitioner No. 2 is alleged to have assaulted Raju Giri with knife.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15348 of 2026(3) dt.14-07-2026 2/3 have committed no offence. The present case is counter-blast of Dariyapur P.S. Case No. 321 of 2025 which was lodged by petitioners' side which is earlier in point of time, against informant and others and only with a view to save their skin from the aforesaid case, this false and concocted case has been lodged. The present F.I.R. has been lodged after inordinate delay of 16 days and there is no plausible explanation for the same, which itself makes the entire prosecution case doubtful. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and there is absolutely no allegation of overt act against Petitioner No. 1. Doctor has found the injuries, allegedly caused by these petitioners, simple in nature.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, case and counter-case between the parties, delay in lodging of the F.I.R. and nature of injuries allegedly caused by these petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15348 of 2026(3) dt.14-07-2026 3/3 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chapra, Saran in connection with Dariyapur P.S. Case No. 352 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T