Daroga Singh @ Mahendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15829 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-436 Year-2025 Thana- AKHODHIGOLA District- Rohtas ====================================================== Daroga Singh @ Mahendra singh son of Jaga Singh Resident of VillageBagen, P.O. -Chandi, P.S. -Akorhigola, District -Rohtas at Sasaram ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Sudha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 25-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Akorhigola P.S. Case No. 436 of 2025, dated 06.11.2025, lodged under Section 115(2), 126(2), 329, 109 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as "BNS, 2023"), pending before the Court of S.D.J.M, Dehri (Rohtas).

3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against two named accused persons, including the present petitioner, alleging that both the accused persons assaulted the informant, his father, his mother, and his uncle with a lathi, causing injuries to them.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He further submits that the criminal antecedent of the petitioner is not

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15829 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026 2/2 clean, as one criminal case is pending against him. He further submits that the injury sustained is simple in nature. He also submits that the petitioner shall fulfill all the conditions whatsoever may be imposed by this Court.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the criminal antecedent of the petitioner is not clean.

6. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

7. It is directed to the petitioner to surrender before the Trial Court within a period of 6 weeks from today. In case, the petitioner surrenders within six weeks, then the Trial Court is directed to pass order on his surrender-cum-bail application on the same day without being prejudice that the anticipatory bail of the petitioner has been rejected by this Court and the Trial Court shall pass order on the merit of this case. (Dr. Anshuman, J.) Aman Kumar/- U T