Kamaldev Ram @ Kamaldev Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15470 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-483 Year-2025 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran ====================================================== Kamaldev Ram @ Kamaldev Kumar Ram S/o Shailesh Ram Resident of Village- Sidhwaliya, P.S.- Chapra Muffasil, Dist.- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjeet Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms.Anita Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 483 of 2025 dated 23.08.2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section/s 126(2), 115(2), 109, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. As per the prosecution case, on 21.08.2025 at about 7 PM, while the informant was at his house, the accused persons allegedly came there, abused him, and assaulted him with sticks and batons. During the incident, Kamaldeo Ram (petitioner) allegedly hit Sujit Ram and Chhati Lal Ram on the head with a rod, causing injuries.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15470 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026 2/3 present case. it is next submitted that the Informant and the petitioner are agnates and there is a case and counter case between them and the entire family have been roped in this case. It is next submitted that though there is specific allegation of assault against the petitioner but, from the impugned order, it appears that the injury caused is simple in nature and the other accused persons have already been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by the district court itself. Lastly, it is submitted that the petitioner is a person of clean antecedent.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into account the fact that both the parties are agnates and there is a case and counter case between the parties as also the injury being simple in nature, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15470 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026 3/3 Chapra in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 483 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. as well as the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors should be the family member/relative/known of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official document / personal affidavit to show his/her bona fide; (ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bond by the Trial Court itself;
(iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;
(iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds. (Ajit Kumar, J) rishi/- U T